Product Description "Life in the city, for the millions who lived it, was once something less than the sum of their lifestyle choices: they woke up, they ate, they shoveled coal, loved, hated, prayed, mated, reproduced, died. For most, the home was not a display object but a place to keep the few things they had managed to hold on to from the surpluses produced by their labor. Their material life was made of the things they didn't have to eat, wear, or burn right this minute. A concertina maybe? A family Bible? A hunting rifle?"
This life in "the old neighborhood," so lyrically captured by Ray Suarez, was once lived by a huge number of Americans. One in seven of us can directly connect our lineage through just one city, Brooklyn. In 1950, except for Los Angeles, the top ten American cities were all in the Northeast or Midwest, and all had populations over 800,000. Since then, especially since the mid-60s, a way of life has simply vanished.
Ray Suarez, veteran interviewer and host of NPR's "Talk of the Nation," is a child of Brooklyn who has long been fascinated with the stories behind the largest of our once-great cities. He has talked to longtime residents, recent arrivals, and recent departures; community organizers, priests, cops, and politicians; and scholars who have studied neighborhoods, demographic trends, and social networks. The result is a rich tapestry of voices and history. The Old Neighborhood captures a crucial chapter in the experience of postwar America. It is a book not just for first- and second-generation Americans, but for anyone who remembers the prewar cities or wonders how we could have gotten to where we are. It is a book about "old neighborhoods" that were once cherished, and are now lost.
Amazon.com Review With a great deal of sadness, NPR host Ray Suarez chronicles the effects of the American migration from cities to suburbs in the second half of the 20th century. He visited a number of cities--including Chicago, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Miami, and Washington--to find out what went wrong. The Old Neighborhood makes its case with an effective mix of data and quotes from interviews with community organizers, government officials, people who stayed in the cities, and those who left. One of the best things about the book--no doubt a product of Suarez's radio background--is its tendency for extended quotes, where the voices of his interview subjects more fully emerge.
Suarez passes blame around freely for what happened to the cities and their neighborhoods, citing the loss of inner-city manufacturing jobs, crime, the decline of urban schools, and the increased availability of the automobile and development of highway systems. But mostly he blames America's inability to deal with race, asserting that whites simply don't want to live with blacks and will continue to move out further and further to prevent that from happening. (Suarez has little to say, however, about the tendency of middle-class blacks to flee the city as well.)
Although crime was down and job creation up in cities in the '90s, Suarez tends to focus on the negative. He did not, for example, interview people who moved back to the cities because their children finished school and they tired of long, bumper-to-bumper commutes and the lack of cultural offerings in the suburbs. And while many of the people he did talk to say they miss the close-knit community of their downtown neighborhoods, almost all say they are happy they left and were able to give their children a better life. Still, The Old Neighborhood remains an extremely readable clarion call for the importance of city life, obviously written from the heart. --Linda Killian
A college student perspective December 8, 2003 1 out of 16 found this review helpful
I started to read this book for a community service class. As I read I got more and more angry at the book. I understand that I don't really know what "city" is disappering as I came from a incrediably small town in Iowa. However, is it really all that bad that the old neighborhood city is disappearing? Maybe we all just need more room to breath! I also found this book incrediably racist. I'm sorry, I have "black" friends and "hispanic" friends living near me in Iowa and I don't even see their skin color. People, realize that we are living in the new age and that racist feelings are not really harbored in the small towns compaired to larger cities. The people who moved out did it for other reasons..I'm not saying that some didn't, I'm saying most did. And the author never ever says anything about those people moving back to the cities. If he wants to present an argument fully he has to see both sides. And he never did.
I LOVED THIS BOOK September 26, 2000 6 out of 6 found this review helpful
Do not read this book as a cold analysis of what went wrong in our cities, although you will certainly gain some insight into the causes of urban decline. Saurez speaks with the voice of many of us who love much about cities: walking on city sidewalks and waving to neighbors we actually know as they sit on their porches, enjoying the architecture of older storefronts where unique non-chain shops still flourish, and feeling part of a real community.
Other reviewers say Saurez concentrates too much on racism as a cause of the loss of those communities. I think rather he simply reports what he saw and makes no apology for feeling city life offered so much more than living in the non-places of highways and strip malls and cul-de-sacs with no sidewalks that characterize America's suburbs.
Saurez has written a book that needed to be written.
Stuck in traffic. February 5, 2000 As a 15 year resident of Boston, I was hoping for an engaging, objective read on urban dynamics/dysfunctions but got rather more of a shrill diatribe. One page would contain thoughtful musings and compelling statistics (although just about any statistic can be manipulated to support a given viewpoint) followed by a page of politically correctisms (the one laugh-out-loud moment is when Suarez actually claims he is not PC!) Too many good questions are raised to easily dismiss what is presented here but its angry, insulting tone and over-emphasis on racism almost cancels this out and you are left with a near-wash.
Sidesteps key issue of African American crime and racism September 21, 1999 42 out of 47 found this review helpful
In the opening chapter "WHAT WE LOST" the author sums up the relative soulnessness of suburban vs. urban living in the sentence "The automobile, that ultimate isolator, turned life into a TV show, a mediated set of images seen through the screen of our windshields" (p.20). After having lived for four years in Paris I understand exactly what Mr Suarez is bemoaning when he describes the community and sense of belonging people had in an urban environment, which was lost in the U.S during the "white flight" to the suburbs. In Paris I walked everywhere, knew my neighbours and was surrounded by small businesses, restaurants and cafes, a far cry from the neatly manicured lawns and people empty streets of suburbia, or to use the term coined by Mr Suarez "autosuburbanalia". This is a thought-provoking book that does an excellent job of exploring what was lost in the migration of European Americans and later middle class African Americans to the suburbs, it also contains an excellent analysis of what happened. Where the book failed was it's inability to fully explore the Why part of the equation. Mr Saurez puts the blame for white flight to the suburbs and the subsequent deterioration of inner cities squarely on the shoulders of European American intolerance and racism. The implied thesis of this book is that inner cities deteriorated because integration did not work due to the inability of European Americans to accept their new African American neighbours, in fact towards the end there are several pages devoted to examples of European American racism towards new neighbours of color. Legitimately held fears of African American crime are dismissed in the following manner; "Even if you take into account the statistic that a quarter of all black men are in the criminal justice system - either incarcerated or on parole, or on probation, which is an abnormally high number - that's still three-fourths who are not" (p.77) Mr Saurez paints a pretty damning picture of inner city African Americans despite his best efforts to portray them as innocent victims of economic change, bureaucratic neglect and European American aversion and racism. In fact the author goes one step further and implies that African Americans are justified in their violent attacks on other races: "Interestingly, there were Indians in this drugstore here when I visited just six months ago, now it seems they're gone. You're beginning to see more and more black solidarity, vis-a-vis the Asian and Indian business people, which sometimes spills over into real violence. How does a Kim's Market open, how does it survive in a place like this?"(p.70) Blatant violent racism on the part of African Americans towards other peoples is not condemned by the author, in fact it is referred to uncritically and without shame as an expression of "black solidarity", is it any wonder that non African American's choose to move out to the suburbs? Instead of looking for outside excuses Mr Suarez should show African Americans enough respect to acknowledge that they are responsible for their own destiny and thereby carry the blame for the deterioration and violence of the inner city environment they created and in which they live. Despite my difference of opinion with many of the conclusions in this work I highly recommend it to anyone interested in a stimulating, controversial and educational read.
Human nature versus grand expectations June 22, 1999 5 out of 9 found this review helpful
An interesting treatise on how Americans migrated from urban settings to suburban life. The idea that this mass migration started in the mid 1960's puts the question out of date -- about 200 years out of date.
While our European ancestors sought out the urban and urbane life, the archetype of "American" life has been the lone individual on the frontier. Of course, that smacks against our longing for "community." Hence the American myth is schitzoid. We want it both ways. We want contact and community while we want independence and autonomy. Add a dash of racisim and a cup of financial worries and you have baked the current American cake.
Our laws, tax codes, and preferences all stem from the basic American myth of the independent settler depicted in most of our popular fiction. From Laura Ingles-Wilder to Zeyne Grey we love the frontier. Cities are anathema to that vision. As each ethnic group gets "assimilated" that group seeks to live that American dream.
We Americans may come to love the urban and urbane life at some time in the future. However, that will take a long time and require the end of a lot of myths. Sure, some Television shows vaunt the urban/urbane lifestyle but we really don't want that -- we want our own "Little House."
Groups will move into cities, become assimilated and move to the "burbs" and then on towards the "country" in search of the "frontier."
All rights reserved. Amazon.com is a trademark of Amazon.com Information about prices, products, services and merchants is provided by third parties and is for informational purposes only. Caribbean Travel Books does not represent or warrant the accuracy or reliability of the information, and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
